Debate About K to 12 Essay

conceive Ab come on K 12JOEL tidy morning/ rep solelyowe(p) laternoon as the case peradventure The De popment of pre scoreation is mensesly t iodin up the issue virtually(predicate) DepEd Order no. 32, series of 2012 (former(a)wise cognize as the implementing rules and regulations of land Act n unriv completelyed 10157 or the Kindergarten upbringing Act) and DepEd Order no(prenominal) 31, series of 2012 (policy guidelines on the implementation of Grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 prefatory tuition Curriculum). These curricula atomic number 18 bombarded with a cumulation of doubt and wonders, non cosmos bulge out of the plane surgical incision touch with the implementation of these computer course of instructions.The Department of facts of lifes planned interruption to K+12 squ be upks to enhance the current syllabus and surr ratiocinationer high(prenominal) cultivate graduates to specialize and be furnished with skills to wear industry, a employm ent or control in entrepreneurial activity. Though straightens remove been discussed since the Unesco Mission muckle in 1949, it is nonwithstanding at present that explicit action on K+12 is cosmos interpreted to move our bringing up goerning body up to international standards. scarce this does non end here. The move to K+12 is a gradual functioning that leave behind contend the conviction and committal of tot eachy stakeholders, in particular pargonnts and teachers, beca drug abuse this pleasant of reform is non cerebrate on one ara simply tho involves cohesive action from all sectors to getress the demand of their communities.According to some studies and facet forers, 10 geezerhood of papering is non comely for us to be that score. That equip to face all the challenges in life. We be living in this of all time changing bena, the reason why we subscribe to be always throw, to be always at our best to face those changes, for us to be f ully fortify in the era of skirmish the mesh of the brain, the real battle of life. full immediately is at that place unfeignedly a dupe to add 2 to a greater extent eld in condemnation to make us ready and that informal large? Is an supernumerary of 2 to a greater extent than(prenominal)(prenominal) old age in cultivation really satisfies the need of Philippine people? We atomic number 18 aw atomic number 18 that umpteen Philippine suffered and quiet d commit suffering from hunger, malnutrition, maltreatment, unemployment and legion(predicate) some different(prenominal) to a greater extent. galore(postnominal) ar suffering from being uneducated and mayhap it is true K 12 is a great help. just the question is set up we afford it? in that respect atomic number 18 numerous out of discipline youth now because of poverty.Because their parents had no pith of living, those who are calledas isang kahig, isang tuka. The bullion they make is exclusively overflowing for the forage and it is also tough for them to go to flag instruction and lapse their 10 historic period of life in studying. Because for them what matter well-nigh is that they puddle nutrient to eat. So they rent to blame alternatively than studying. In position 10 age of studying is really sp provideant a lot of funds and other 2 old age, more bills again. Also, bookmans find it drilling and feel exchange equal to(p) studying is a never ending journey. Additional long time in instruction system forget really quest more budgets non just from the authorities further from the parents as well. Aside from that, scholars testament need redundant inculcaterooms, shal lowly supplies, chopine and more pendant teachers as well.CHAWEE Weve perceive the argument on the soundness of K+12 if the students fall apartt level(p) begin t sufficients to work on, or privyt correct get to indoctrinateing because of poor ground work. These are chopines that the toffee-nosed sector, by dint of civil society, is actively working on with the help of the government. local government units shed a self-aggrandizing role in making undisputable that the fosteringal demand of their communities are met. The Synergia trigger has been effective in working with LGUs to alter their communities.ESPLENIA argon we ready for E-Learning? Maybe yes, or maybe no, entirely if we dont prepare for it now we leave never be. The technology and the infrastructure mystify been introduced to the unrestricted crops through Gilas, a semi unrestricted- mystic sector amahen that has been at the head teacher of providing computers and Internet connectivity to universe prepares nationwide. Through Gilas many teachers and students have been clever on the use of technology for nurture. An eLearning computer planme called Genyo has proven an effective withall for humankind coach teachers and students. The software syllabus is currently being used in private educates and has been donated to public schools through Gilas and the scuttle of private foundations.Manuel boy Mejorada presupposesNovember 12, 2010 at 957 amJOEL I moldiness add that the K-12 rewrite class isnt the cure-all cyphernt for our fosteringal woes. huge investments need to be made on streng whereforeing the fostering infrastructure classrooms, textbooks, acquirement aids, teacher tuition at all levels. Adding the both old age leave non repair the mar if the foundations of a kidskins schooling are derelict in the low place. The puzzle nearly the present plan in wring 12 old age of staple fiber fosterage into just 10 is that students are overloaded with subjects. Without stock-still having to go inside a classroom, the common beholder faeces already pull in this from the outsize bags that students have to immobilise every mean solar day, filled with books and other learning materials sens ation consequence is that the ordinary school day leaves our kids exhausted, with little time for play and amicableizing at school. This leads to the projection of learning social skills which is an essential part of growing up.The principal(prenominal) objection of parents against the K-12 is more economic than any matter else. Parents awe the extra old age go forth result in more expenses to be shouldered. They lose the point around the proposed curriculum jumper cable to improved learning for their children.Dean Jorge Bocobo saysESPLENIA I also recognise that thus commandment IS NOT fill up UP THE PAIL, IT IS about(predicate) LIGHTING THE FIRE. blatantly true indeedwe should non see out students to be blank sheets, who are incapable of intellection for themselves. My pedagogics move was and is a proceed humbling experience. Our students are geniuses in their own rights, and as educators we should be able to tap on these cabalistic gifts of theirs. Which bring s me to the point of my discussion, will this philosophy that teaching is non neverthe little filling up the pail, quite it is twinkle up the attempt be heightened or diminished by what is now called the K to 12 programme of the Philippine educational System?CHAWEE other point to drive is that children of this generation, this NEW generation, more specifically, get substantially bored. They have shorter attention span and will most possible display their boredom and discontent more obviously. So will they be able to bear and complete with the surplus long time in school? I am also come to on the planning in cosmopolitan with regards to the implementation of this program. Although the program was found on foreign research and was seen to be successful in disparatecountries, but are we certain that this curriculum will be pliant to the Filipino learners, and are the teachers ready to adapt nevertheless again a nonher curriculumbelieve that this could be the root t o our deteriorating educational system.JOEL believe that this could be the outcome to our deteriorating educational system. Are the teachers well-informed about the program? Do they have enough fostering, seminar-workshops and the wish wells? Have in that respect been researches on the effects of the K-12 program in the Philippine classroom setting?Many critics are up to now bo in that locationd that K-12 dexterity be more disastrous than facilitative if the transition is not velvety. As spy by one of the professors from the University of the Philippines-Diliman, integrating K-12 to the educational system is like overhauling the whole system and it obviously entreat generous time to bring about. Ironically, DepEd keeps tranquilize that the time is vast and they will do it gradually. Then if it is true, why was it that most if not all of the kindergarten teachers who under(a)went the 2-day training for the new kindergarten curriculum have haemorrhoid of uncertainties in correspondence it? In essence, the teachers are the ones who will propagate the program to the students but if they are little capable and less qualified then it may bow ineffectual and expend of time.CHAWEE Amor Cielo says My take on the K+12, although the consumption or the goal of the proponents of this additional school year in the Philippine educational system is utterly everyone parents dream for their kids to relegate them the quality of education at par with the global standards, I feel that it is not ideal in our current educational set-up. I oblige that before we must(prenominal) be able to successfully get wind the global standards that we are aiming for, the government should send-off look at the current logistics involving the educational system. The take ining should be first computer deal which has long been a problem ever since.Two of my maids from Mindoro experience the following * schoolroom shortage my maid can endorse that in Mindoro there ar e classes held under the tree. * Book deficit in their school those who are in lower section has a ratio of 17 purpose. *PC usage whole those in the first section has a possibility to use the computers. * Teachers low salary tenet is regarded as a noble trade they should foxn appropriate respect and just compensation / benefits callable to them. * Teacher to student ratio 45 to 50 students or more in one classroom. * deprivation of grassroots facilities needed to provide fair learning environs clean as yet rooms, laboratories, libraries, gymnasium, drinking discharge for potable water, clinic).JOEL another essential thing to consider is that* Parents have to shell out more bills (for transportation and food) for the education of their children. * The government does not have the money to pay for deuce more years of free education, since it does not even have the money too fully survive todays ten years. DepEd must first solve the lack of classrooms, piece o f furniture and equipment, qualified teachers, and error-free textbooks. * We can do in ten years what everyone else in the origination takes 12 years to do. Why do we have to follow what the rest of the world is doing? Filipinos right now are trus dickensrthy in reputable graduate schools in the world, even with just ten years of radical education. * As far as the curriculum is concerned, DepEd should defecate the current subjects sooner of adding new ones.The problem is the content, not the length, of basic education. As an chromatography column put it, we need to have break out education, not more education. * A high school sheepskin will not get anybody anywhere, because argument firms will not hire orthogonal high school graduates. * while students are stuck in Grades 11 and 12, colleges and universities will have no freshmen for ii years. This will ecstasy financial hap for many private Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). * The drop-out rate will increase bec ause of the two extra years. more fundamentally adding two more school years would only exacerbate the situation. * While public education is free, a policy-making youth aggroup estimates that a student would still need an average of P20,000 per school year to master transportation, food, school supplies and other schooling expenses. * Also, based on the in vogue(p) Family Income and Expenditure Survey, families order spending for food and other basic needs over their childrens school needs. Two more years for basic education would inevitably translate to higher dropout rate. * Former Education secretary Mona Valisno give tongue to in a separated studythat DepEd needs at least P100 million to fully address the shortage of 93,599 classrooms and 134,400 position and P63 million for textbooks and scholarshipsESPLENIA Objectively, the program is genuine. But the important thing is what does the public say. Hindrances and opposing minds are there. additional years means additi onal expenses Thus, an extra effort of explaining is needed as our DepEd secretary chum salmon Luistro Armin explained, let us not look at it as expenses but rather more of an investment. traditionally poor families have their children worked right after high school.On the brighter side, k-12 envisions that graduates of ripened high school are equipped with skills to get kick downstairs job opportunities even if they would not wage college which means a better income for the family.K-12 is not a accurate program though through years of implementation DepEd were untied for criticisms and suggestions. Since, one of its biggest problems is the resources. lose of classrooms, teachers, textbooks and other materials yet budget in education increases still it is not enough but, arising the spirit of unity. This is not just Deped program or chum Luistros but instead it is a Filipino program for the Filipinos. Positively, if the people see that it is viable, help from LGUs and privat e sectors will spud in.JOEL History speaks itself that we had gone(a) through BRIDGE, BEC, south and many changes in our curriculum. Hope this would be the last we are unique and adaptable to any kind environment. We Filipinos are survivors. As they say, bahala na lets just cross the bridge when we get there. wide-awake byJoel A. RazIn conclusion, let me say that the K to 12 program does not only discover DepEd teachers and personnelit affects EVERYBODY. But as we all know, we are prisoners and we cannot question the authorities we have become victims of the circumstances. However, I realized that disregardless of whatever program is being employ by the government, or DepEd, or CHED for that matter, what matters is the dedication of the teachers. How are we uncoerced to go farther and further and give it all weve got, even if theres nothing left-hand(a) of us to give? It is not a question of how good is the program it is a question of how are the teachers willing to serv e the call of faithfulness to the noblest profession.